Q. Which schools are great for study of network - information security in terms of job & quality education?
Can someone tell me which is the best college in the New York city where I can get my undergraduate degree in Network - Information security in terms of job, internship and quality education?
Can someone tell me which is the best college in the New York city where I can get my undergraduate degree in Network - Information security in terms of job, internship and quality education?
A. Hi Raseen,
If you are interested in database administration or computer science, then information security training can quickly prepare you for the ever-evolving Information Technology( IT ) world. Good training in information security (IS) provides comprehensive skills in communications and technology in order to protect computer systems and sensitive information from unwarranted invasion.
Future database administrators ( or information security specialists) will learn how to safeguard and protect highly-sensitive data and other private information from prying eyes. Primarily geared for electronic media, training in IS can teach you how to prevent invasion of computer and electronic devices from cyber criminals, computer hackers, Trojans, viruses, and worms.
In addition to standard curriculum in Information Technology (IT), students will acquire vital skills in innovative technologies, computer system auditing, data loss recovery, hacker interventions and techniques, intrusion detection, and perimeter safeguarding methods. Additionally,these Courses will commonly involve technological programming and software that utilizes critical passwords, firewalls, virus protection and other related methodologies.
Students may earn Certifications Such as the CISSP( Certified Information Systems Security Professional) and SSCP ( Systems Security Certified Practitioner); or may choose to further their Studies to attain College degrees in computer science, including Associate, Bachelor and Master Degrees.
If you are interested in the challenging and rewarding field of IS, we invite you to contact vocational Schools, Colleges and universities providing information security Courses you can visit the link below and if you want the information about any type of Careers at your door step Just fill the Career Information Request form under the tab Request Form.
Good Luck For Your Studies.
If you are interested in database administration or computer science, then information security training can quickly prepare you for the ever-evolving Information Technology( IT ) world. Good training in information security (IS) provides comprehensive skills in communications and technology in order to protect computer systems and sensitive information from unwarranted invasion.
Future database administrators ( or information security specialists) will learn how to safeguard and protect highly-sensitive data and other private information from prying eyes. Primarily geared for electronic media, training in IS can teach you how to prevent invasion of computer and electronic devices from cyber criminals, computer hackers, Trojans, viruses, and worms.
In addition to standard curriculum in Information Technology (IT), students will acquire vital skills in innovative technologies, computer system auditing, data loss recovery, hacker interventions and techniques, intrusion detection, and perimeter safeguarding methods. Additionally,these Courses will commonly involve technological programming and software that utilizes critical passwords, firewalls, virus protection and other related methodologies.
Students may earn Certifications Such as the CISSP( Certified Information Systems Security Professional) and SSCP ( Systems Security Certified Practitioner); or may choose to further their Studies to attain College degrees in computer science, including Associate, Bachelor and Master Degrees.
If you are interested in the challenging and rewarding field of IS, we invite you to contact vocational Schools, Colleges and universities providing information security Courses you can visit the link below and if you want the information about any type of Careers at your door step Just fill the Career Information Request form under the tab Request Form.
Good Luck For Your Studies.
How many black boxes were found after the 4 planes crashed on 911?
Q. I know the black box from the plane that crashed in PA on 911 was recovered- Were the black boxes from either plane that hit the World trade Center, as well as the one that hit the Pentagon recovered as well? I thought I read at kleast one black box was recovered from ground zero in NYC, but i could be wrong.
A. The 2 blackboxes from Flight UA093 was recovered, that's how we have as much information on that flight as we do.
I found this..
"Amid the enormous detail of loss, sorrow and recovery conveyed in "A New York City firefighter reveals that at least three of the four black boxes from Flights 11 and 175 were found by "Federal Agents" at the former World Trade Center site, during the clean-up efforts from September 2001 to March 2002."
I also found this..
"The black box flight data and cockpit voice recorders from the hijacked plane that crashed into the Pentagon have been recovered.The two black boxes are crucial to uncovering details about the doomed flight's last moments."
Therefore, 7 of the 8 blackboxes were recovered.
I hope that helps.
- Clarke.
I found this..
"Amid the enormous detail of loss, sorrow and recovery conveyed in "A New York City firefighter reveals that at least three of the four black boxes from Flights 11 and 175 were found by "Federal Agents" at the former World Trade Center site, during the clean-up efforts from September 2001 to March 2002."
I also found this..
"The black box flight data and cockpit voice recorders from the hijacked plane that crashed into the Pentagon have been recovered.The two black boxes are crucial to uncovering details about the doomed flight's last moments."
Therefore, 7 of the 8 blackboxes were recovered.
I hope that helps.
- Clarke.
how can you find a lost tape recorder erased message by listening to static and ambient noise statistically?
Q.
A. How can you find a lost tape recorder erased message by listening to static and ambient noise statistically
Well, there are data recovery services that use computer technology to enhance tape recordings. The static and ambient noise would be impediments to hearing the message, though.
Forensic science has developed techniques in unscrambling voices and voice recognition. One person involved said it is like true âaudio archeologyâ. http://www.all-about-forensic-science.com/forensic-authenticity-analyses-of-taperecorded-evidence.html
It looks to me that most of the time the messages cannot be retrieved. If all these experts could not retrieve the missing material on the Nixon tapes, it doesn't look like it is a tenable project.
Paul Ginsberg owns more than 100 tape recorders, most of them crammed into his basement audio lab, a low-ceilinged lair in Spring Valley, New York, that he likes to call the Tape Cave. Ginsberg is among a handful of forensic audio experts vying to crack the infamous 18 1/2-minute gap in a White House tape recorded three days after the burglary. The gap appears in a recording made on June 20, 1972, as Nixon discussed the Watergate break-in for the first time with his chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman. When the White House revealed that part of the conversation had been "accidentally" erased, a majority of Americans came to believe that the man who insisted "I am not a crook" was that and more. Nixon resigned in disgrace in 1974, but in the years since Watergate, the gap has remained a tantalizing mystery.
Last summer, (2001) the National Archives and Records Administration decided it was time to take another look, in the hope that advances in digital technology would be able to restore the conversation. NARA invited audio experts to demonstrate how they might retrieve intelligible speech. The competition - a battle of the bands among a dozen or fewer audio experts must show they can retrieve sound from test erasures without doing damage. Those who succeed will get a crack at the real thing.
Tape 342, as it's known by archivists, was last tested in 1974 by a panel of audio experts, who concluded that the erasures were done in separate segments. Whoever erased the tape pressed Record, stopped the tape, and hit Record again, between five and nine times - hardly an accidental erasure. But the panel was unable to retrieve any of the lost conversation. At the point of the first erasure, the muffled conversation is suddenly replaced by a buzzing noise, presumably the sound of a 60-cycle hum leaking from the power grid as interpreted by a high-gain microphone input circuit. Throughout the gap, the buzz occasionally drops in volume, but never is there any discernible speech. etc.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.07/nixon.html
================================================
2003 The National Archives said audio experts were unable to recapture unintelligible words from test tapes designed to simulate the recording made famous in the Watergate scandal. In 2001, the archives created a panel of experts to determine whether advances in the field of forensic audio technology could recover what was on the tape recorded three days after the break-in. Based on the results of two tests, Carlin decided not to continue the effort to turn the gap â a series of clicks, hisses and buzzes â into intelligible speech. "We were really hopeful that there would be some technology out there to recapture the sound, but we'll have to put the tape away and possibly re-examine newer advances at a later date," Cooper said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/27/politics/main565298.shtml
Forensics forum
Q. I have a crazy client who needs to recover an erased audio recording from a cassette recorder (tape). The tape containing a deposition was transcribed and then purposely erased by the transcriber as per standard procedures. Now, they want it back. I expressed doubt that such a thing was possible. The client seemed to think it was possible to recover the recording, if not from the tape itself then from the "heads" on the recorder. Anyone have any thoughts on this. Is my client crazy, or am I!
A. If a degausser (the easiest and fastest way to erase recordable media) was used there is usually no way to recover the recording. However if the degausser was weak or was not used long enough you may find some remnants.
Well, there are data recovery services that use computer technology to enhance tape recordings. The static and ambient noise would be impediments to hearing the message, though.
Forensic science has developed techniques in unscrambling voices and voice recognition. One person involved said it is like true âaudio archeologyâ. http://www.all-about-forensic-science.com/forensic-authenticity-analyses-of-taperecorded-evidence.html
It looks to me that most of the time the messages cannot be retrieved. If all these experts could not retrieve the missing material on the Nixon tapes, it doesn't look like it is a tenable project.
Paul Ginsberg owns more than 100 tape recorders, most of them crammed into his basement audio lab, a low-ceilinged lair in Spring Valley, New York, that he likes to call the Tape Cave. Ginsberg is among a handful of forensic audio experts vying to crack the infamous 18 1/2-minute gap in a White House tape recorded three days after the burglary. The gap appears in a recording made on June 20, 1972, as Nixon discussed the Watergate break-in for the first time with his chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman. When the White House revealed that part of the conversation had been "accidentally" erased, a majority of Americans came to believe that the man who insisted "I am not a crook" was that and more. Nixon resigned in disgrace in 1974, but in the years since Watergate, the gap has remained a tantalizing mystery.
Last summer, (2001) the National Archives and Records Administration decided it was time to take another look, in the hope that advances in digital technology would be able to restore the conversation. NARA invited audio experts to demonstrate how they might retrieve intelligible speech. The competition - a battle of the bands among a dozen or fewer audio experts must show they can retrieve sound from test erasures without doing damage. Those who succeed will get a crack at the real thing.
Tape 342, as it's known by archivists, was last tested in 1974 by a panel of audio experts, who concluded that the erasures were done in separate segments. Whoever erased the tape pressed Record, stopped the tape, and hit Record again, between five and nine times - hardly an accidental erasure. But the panel was unable to retrieve any of the lost conversation. At the point of the first erasure, the muffled conversation is suddenly replaced by a buzzing noise, presumably the sound of a 60-cycle hum leaking from the power grid as interpreted by a high-gain microphone input circuit. Throughout the gap, the buzz occasionally drops in volume, but never is there any discernible speech. etc.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.07/nixon.html
================================================
2003 The National Archives said audio experts were unable to recapture unintelligible words from test tapes designed to simulate the recording made famous in the Watergate scandal. In 2001, the archives created a panel of experts to determine whether advances in the field of forensic audio technology could recover what was on the tape recorded three days after the break-in. Based on the results of two tests, Carlin decided not to continue the effort to turn the gap â a series of clicks, hisses and buzzes â into intelligible speech. "We were really hopeful that there would be some technology out there to recapture the sound, but we'll have to put the tape away and possibly re-examine newer advances at a later date," Cooper said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/27/politics/main565298.shtml
Forensics forum
Q. I have a crazy client who needs to recover an erased audio recording from a cassette recorder (tape). The tape containing a deposition was transcribed and then purposely erased by the transcriber as per standard procedures. Now, they want it back. I expressed doubt that such a thing was possible. The client seemed to think it was possible to recover the recording, if not from the tape itself then from the "heads" on the recorder. Anyone have any thoughts on this. Is my client crazy, or am I!
A. If a degausser (the easiest and fastest way to erase recordable media) was used there is usually no way to recover the recording. However if the degausser was weak or was not used long enough you may find some remnants.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
